Companies House Reform: Compliance, Intelligence and Data Sharing

Companies House Reform: Compliance, Intelligence and Data Sharing

The government intends to permit the cross-referencing of data held by Companies House against other data sets to improve the quality of information held by other public and private sector bodies. However, concrete detail is lacking and reforms that would have gone further, such as requiring companies to provide details of any overseas bank accounts, were rejected. Below, Elemental reviews how the government proposes to ensure compliance and share intelligence.

Corporate transparency and register reform: Government Response

In the fifth and final of a series of articles examining the recently published government response to the consultation on enhancing the role of Companies House and transparency of UK corporate entities, we review the reform of compliance and data sharing.

Cross-referencing with data sets, feedback loops and risk-based intelligence sharing

There was strong support behind the proposal for Companies House to compare its data against data sets held by other public and private sector bodies. The most suggested data set was HMRC, however others were suggested including HM Passport Office, DVLA, DWP, HM Land Registry and the electoral register.

The government has decided to proceed with the proposals as part of a package of measures which are key to tackling the misuse of corporate entities and combatting economic crime. The goal is to provide businesses with increased confidence in the information held on the company register.

Such an undertaking will present significant IT and data protection challenges. It is, therefore, unsurprising that the next step in the process is a feasibility study and a review of the IT systems that will facilitate the exchange and comparison of data.

Disclosure of Banking Information

The government invited views on whether companies should be obliged to provide details of their overseas bank accounts to Companies House. Most responses were negative citing privacy and data protection concerns along with the risk of fraud.

The government acknowledges the concerns and, although there would be some benefit to law enforcement agencies having access to such data, the burden placed on companies would outweigh this. Therefore, the proposals will not be taken forward.

Corporate Transparency and Register Reform – Conclusions

This and the previous articles published by Elemental have discussed the main issues raised following the publication of the government’s response to the consultation on options to enhance the role of Companies House and increase the transparency of UK corporate entities.

The reforms, rushed out following the FinCEN file leak by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, have been broadly welcomed by professional bodies such as the ICAEW and the ICSA. Many of the reforms feel overdue and, if implemented correctly, will greatly improve the confidence in the information supplied by Companies House.

How Elemental can help

We believe that company secretarial and compliance matters. These reforms show how important they are and how much is likely to be changing over the next few years. For more information on our company secretarial services or to speak to one of our experts, please get in touch.

We’re here to keep things simple

If you would like to find out more about our services and how we can help support your business, please get in touch.

+44 (0)203 286 6229